k-12

FairTest's letter to U.S. House education staff in response to a letter from Education Committee Chair George Miller

Date: July 11, 2007

Achievement Tests for Young Children

During the 1970s and '80s, the pressure for students to attain high test scores on standardized, multiple-choice achievement tests spread to the primary grades. Tests such as the California Achievement Test (made by CTB/McGraw-Hill) or Metropolitan Achievement Test (Psychological Corporation), which are supposed to measure students' skills in specific areas like math or reading, are now given as early as grades 1 and 2.

 

Readiness Tests

The main reason for testing and evaluating students must be to improve student learning. Each year, however, public school students in the U.S. must take millions of standardized tests which are more harmful than helpful and which do nothing to improve the equality of instruction or learning for students.

 

Among the tests which are especially damaging to young children are readiness tests. Schools frequently use the scores from readiness tests to judge whether children are 'ready' for kindergarten or are 'ready' for promotion to first grade.

The Testing Explosion

America's public schools administer more than 100 million standardized exams each year, including IQ, achievement, screening, and readiness tests.

Much of the time and money devoted to testing is misspent. Too many tests are poorly constructed, unreliable, and unevenly administered. Multiple-choice questions cannot measure thinking skills, creativity, the ability to solve real problems, or the social skills we want our children to have. Moreover, many exams are biased racially, culturally, linguistically, and by class and gender.

How Standardized Testing Damages Education

How do schools use standardized tests?
Despite their biases, inaccuracies, limited ability to measure achievement or ability, and other flaws, schools use standardized tests to determine if children are ready for school, track them into instructional groups; diagnose for learning disability, retardation and other handicaps; and decide whether to promote, retain in grade, or graduate many students. Schools also use tests to guide and control curriculum content and teaching methods.

Measuring Learning Does Not Improve Learning: Fact Sheet on Bill Clinton's National Testing Plan

The Clinton Administration Proposal

 

Chicago Parents Guide to Testing (Spanish Version)

Los Ex?menes ITBS y TAP

Lo que todos los Padres Necesitan Conocer

    * Padres, ?creen ustedes que solamente los ex?menes, Iowa (ITBS) o TAP de la escuela secundaria pueden medir correctamente las habilidades de sus hijos?
    *

    * ?Creen ustedes que si su hijo a trabaja fuerte y lo suficiente, el o ella deber?a pasar el ITBS o el TAP?
    *

    * ?Cu?nto realmente saben ustedes sobre los ex?menes ITBS y TAP? y ?c?mo esto tendr? que ver en el futuro de sus hijos?
    *

Chicago Parents Guide to Testing

  • Parents, do you believe that either the Iowa (ITBS) or the high school TAP tests alone accurately measure your child's abilities?
  • Do you believe that, if your child works hard enough, he or
    she should be able to "pass" the ITBS or TAP?
  • How much do you really know about the ITBS and TAP tests, on which so much of your child's future depends?

This booklet was written especially for Chicago Public School parents bythe

Parents Say No to Ohio Proficiency Test

Who are the BULLIES?

The State of Ohio legislators are bullying us into believing that:

TRUTH: Testing can never replace authentic learning demonstrated and evaluated in the classroom. NO single test can assess critical thinking and problem-solving skills adequately enough to be used for such high-stakes decisions.

The OPT one-size-fits-all assessment model is valid.

TRUTH: OPTs ignore individual learning styles and economic and cultural backgrounds.

Wisconsin Standards and Assessments Q & A

Syndicate content